| Dear Rev. Know-It-All,
I recently heard an eminent theologian
say it is a shame that the word “ecclesia,” (usually translated by
the word assembly, the root of such words as ecclesiastical etc.,) is used
by the Catholic hierarchy.
How dare they use a word that referred
to the glorious Athenian democracy when talking about a monarchical male
dominated cabal like the Roman Catholic hierarchy?
Shouldn't we Catholics be allowed to vote
on what we believe?
I'm very concerned.
Demi Kratick

Dear very concerned Demi,
It never fails to amaze me what a bumper
crop of dim bulbs that the late 20th century American theology has produced.
First of all, the “glorious Athenian
democracy” to which he referred, was a mercifully short lived disaster.
It started with the reforms of Cleisthenes in 507 BC. It ended with
the defeat of the Athenians by Philip of Macedon, father of Alexander the
great, in 338 BC at the battle of Chaeronea.
In that brief span of about 140 years,
the “glorious Athenian democracy” excluded all women, slaves and foreigners
from voting. Thus, maybe a quarter of the population had voting rights.
With their votes, they managed to exile
their greatest leaders, execute Socrates, create an empire that enslaved
other Greek speaking states and plunged all of the Greek world into a civil
war. A war that so weakened her, she was easy pickings for Philip
and his son, Alexander. The consequence being that Greece had no
real political freedom until modern times - 2,300 years later.
Is your eminent theologian referring to
that “glorious Athenian democracy?” If so, he is talking about
the wrong place.
The word ecclesia is a translation
of the Hebrew word qahal by the Jews of Alexandria, Egypt
about 300 BC. The assembly of Alexandria, the capital of Greek speaking
Egypt, where the Scriptures were first translated from Hebrew into Greek
in the text known as the Septuagint, was hardly a democratic decision making
body. More important, these were not Alexandrian Greeks doing the translating.
They were Jews, Old Testament Jews.
The assembly of the people, the Qahal,
was not a deliberative body; it was God’s people gathered to hear God’s
word spoken. They didn't vote on what God had said. They were
there to listen and to obey.
Moses didn't take a vote at the foot of
Mt. Sinai. Had he done so, I’m sure that troublesome sixth commandment
would have been voted down. That would certainly have put the Almighty
in His place! How dare an old Hebrew desert deity tell us how to
live in the 21st century?! We’ll leave that to the theologians!
(I’m joking, in case any of the dim bulbs are reading this.)
Anyway, you can’t vote on the truth.
Remember what I am always telling you.
God has this problem he thinks he’s God. Your job is to hear him
as clearly as you can and to obey as well as you can. That’s my
job too, just like it’s pope’s job and the bishops’ job. God
help us shepherds, and that includes theologians, if we fail to listen
and obey.
Rev. Know-It-All

The
Question Was
-
- -
Shouldn't Catholics
be allowed to vote on what we believe? |
 |