Editorial
Note:
this
question regards Q&A
Let's look
at Harry Potter again
published
on November 18, 2007
AND
Whatchoo talkin'
'bout demonic?
published
on November 11, 2007
AND
Did you hear
Dumbledore is gay?
published
on November 4, 2007
Dear Rev. No-wit-et-al,
Please read the attached article from the
Chicago Tribune - Sunday, November 11, 2007 in the World section, entitled
"Technology
lets Bible be fruitful, multiply" and for which here is a brief
summary: (Christian groups are using the Scriptures to teach literacy
in some of the most out of the way places in the world. Little children
as well as adults by the thousand and perhaps millions are learning to
read and hearing the name 'Jesus' for the first time, using the bible combined
with high tech gadgetry).
... then please explain (spin) the following
quotes from two of your previous articles:
Nov. 4th you wrote: "It strikes me as sad
that the fantasies of childhood have been invaded by the agenda of a group
that grinds a relentless/moral political agenda." (Please see: the
Vatican.)
Nov. 11th you wrote: "It is the very essence
of the demonic : the stronger will devouring the weaker. Imperialism...
is demonic whether it is perpetrated by Nazis, jihads, our own government
or anyone else."
I hope your head isn't spinning too much
or you may end up looking like that poor little girl in that very scary
movie.
Waiting with bated breath,
Tom Enchique

Dear Tom,
Again with the Harry Potter! I had no idea
it would cause so much trouble!
First of all these marvelous translators
and teachers of the Bible aren't dealing with fantasy. That was the point
of my three week tirade, which is now in its fifth week. Even I am getting
tired of it. People are looking for supernatural fantasy and all the time
missing supernatural reality.
The Bible isn't fantasy no matter what
some pseudo scholars say. It is the history of the intervention of the
supernatural kingdom of God in this all too natural world of death and
sorrow. It isn't a fantasy. There is, as far as I can see from the article
you presented, perhaps a moral, but certainly not a political agenda in
the offer of Scriptures to the world. For heaven's sake, it's a two thousand
year old text! It has nothing to do with politics, except that it is the
foundational text of our culture.
And as for your comment on the Vatican,
I know that you conspiracy nuts are convinced that the Vatican is behind
everything from the oil crisis to saturated fats. If the Catholic church
had a fraction of the power that you wackos assign us, things would be
different around here, but they’re not. Those groups pushing this Bible
and literacy program are probably not very fond of the Vatican.
However, as a far right, stick in the mud,
traditional Catholic that I am, I still applaud the relentless efforts
of my separated Christian brethren to share the Gospel. St. Paul says that
he doesn't care about the motive for the preaching, just Christ be preached.
My suspicion is that if people come to know Jesus they will eventually
come to know his bride the Church. But! You can't pin this one on the Magisterium
or the Vatican.
(By the way, Magisterium is a Latin word
that means teaching authority of the Church in its catholic theological
sense. It has nothing to do with Philip Pullman and his hatred of the Catholic
Church.)
As to your second point: Imperialism. The
word imperialism is of course a Latin word derived from the word imperium,
or military command. To offer someone a book is not imperialism nor devouring,
even to offer someone a Harry Potter book is not imperialism. Imperialism
says do as I tell you or I will kill you. Believe as I do or I will cut
off your head. Admittedly, Catholic’s have been involved in some
unfortunate incidents in the past, and regarding this I would ask you to
go to read my brilliant articles about the Spanish inquisition dated May
20th and May 27th, 2007. Our Founder
is truly non-violent even if some of us His followers have been a shade
less than perfect.
Some, not all, fantasies come closer to
seduction than imperialism. Seduction, however is the more devious little
brother of imperialism, and is another form of devouring. My problem with
all this is the element of fantasy. I know I will get in trouble for this
as did Socrates. Some pastor or other said that if a person is well versed
in the faith and of sufficient age, the Harry Potter series is not a danger.
Well, perhaps. It is the blurring of fantasy and reality that happens in
young and unformed minds that becomes dangerous because fantasy so easily
becomes the lie masquerading as truth, an idea that conspiracy nuts might
want to ponder.
The Bible never claims to be fantasy. It
is 2000 years of truth.
Therein lies a huge difference.
As ever,
Rev. Know-It-All
PS No more Harry Potter. Enough already!

The
Question Was
-
- -
A Last Look At
Harry Potter |
 |