| Dear Rev. Know-It-All,
Why do women no longer cover their heads
in respect while in Mass?
Yours Truly,
Shamus O’Verte

Dear Shamus,
Let me first explain your question to our
younger readers.
When
I was young and the woolly mammoth still roamed, women would not think
of entering a Catholic church without their heads covered. It was always
fascinating to see the tissue papers or loose-leaf sheets that were drafted
into use as hats.
The practice seems to refer to a verse
in St. Paul that reads: "Every man who prays or
prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head and every woman who
prays or prophesies with her head UNcovered dishonors her head. It is just
as though she had shaved her head. If a woman does not cover her head she
should have her hair cut off.... For this reason, because of the angels,
a woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head." 1Cor.
11:4-10.
This chapter make feminists howl and is
one of the most obscure passages in the bible, and believe me, it’s got
some stiff competition for that title.
First of all, it is very “proto-Talmudic.”
St. Paul’s obscure line of reasoning that is very rabbinical, the sort
of thing that “can cross a rabbi’s eyes.” Among orthodox Jews, women
often cut their hair very short, almost shaved and then wear a wig, called
a “sheitl.” Go figure.
The rabbis say this is because the Song
of Songs, tells us in chapter 4, verse one and following, that a woman’s
hair is one of her most seductive aspects. "Thy
hair is like a flock of goats descending from Mount Gilead."
( I personally have never found a flock of goats seductive. Maybe it’s
something about Mount Gilead.)
In Numbers 5: 18 there is a reference to
the uncovering of a woman’s head as humiliation.
In the reference just quoted from St. Paul,
the Apostle seems to say that even the angels find a woman’s hair so
lovely that they are distracted by it. St. Paul is mentioning all this
obscure Judaica to bolster an argument. Remember that he is addressing
the Corinthians.
The Corinthians had an unsavory reputation
in the ancient world. The Greek verb “korinthiazein,”
(to play the Corinthian) meant to chase around on a Friday night, if you
catch my drift. Corinth was one of the great seaports of the Greco-Roman
world. To avoid storms and the distance around the Greek Peloponnese, ships
would actually be dragged across the mile wide isthmus of Corinth from
the harbor on the Aegean into the bay of Corinth.
Now,
in Corinth there was a temple in honor of the goddess Aphrodite and there
one found a thousand of the most beautiful women of the ancient world serving
as priestesses of Aphrodite.
They had an interesting sense of liturgy,
if you catch my drift again, and while their boats were being towed overland,
the sailors would run into town to pray. “Salve, nauta”, as
the Romans used to say.
The only women in the ancient world who
went about talking to strange men, and I do mean strange, with their heads
unveiled were priestesses and those of similar profession. So, when the
Christians began to meet in private homes in ancient Corinth, the women,
being at home with their brother’s and sisters in the Lord, would take
off their veils and greet each other with a holy kiss, as is recommended
in Scripture. The Corinthians, peeking through the blinds must have thought
“Oh boy, just what Corinth needs! Another swell religion with friendly
priestesses.
I suspect that St. Paul was simply saying,
“Put your veils back on, girls. The neighbors are getting the wrong impression!”
He bolstered his argument with some good rabbinical reasoning, about angels
and shaved heads.
I have given you lots of reasons and history
for the veiling of women in church. That, however is not your question.
Your question if I recall, is “Why do we no longer do it?”
Back to St. Paul. In his seventh
chapter of the same letter, First Corinthians, he says that
regarding unmarried women he has not received any commandment from the
Lord, but he gives his own opinion. How interesting! St. Paul’s own opinion,
not God’s!
How do we know what is God’s opinion
in the Bible or just St. Paul’s, that old curmudgeon?
In my youth it was easy. The stuff I didn't
like was just St. Paul’s opinion and the stuff I liked was from the Lord.
It was the sixties. We were young and infallible, though the pope was not.
What hogwash!
How do we know what is binding in the Scripture
and what is not? God in His mercy has given the teaching authority of the
Church, called the Magisterium, which has patiently and consistently steered
the ship of faith through stormy seas. As we find things in the Scriptures
which are optional, like veils, there are things like marital fidelity
which are not optional. They are required.
Tradition, guarded by the popes, help us
to know what is necessary and what is not. In the nineteen sixties,
veils on woman were judged to have been unnecessary for that time. Perhaps
at some future date, the culture will again demand veils on women, or moose
horns on men or whatever, but the Lord is glorified in our humility, be
we male or female, as St. Paul points out.
In the Liturgy and the Bible, it is a clear
principle that what is sacred is veiled, that is why we used to veil the
chalice, and some still do. The veiling of women was always a sign of respect
for the sacredness and power of the woman, thought not many understood
it that way.
In the sixties, the veiling of women had
ceased to be a sign of reverence so, off came the veil.
Now of course, many young women, and men
for that matter come to church quite unveiled, and sporting interesting
jewelry etc. in odd places. Perhaps the Holy Spirit dictated that we take
a hiatus from the veiling of women at prayer so as to remember why it had
been done in the first place.
I suspect that we are close to that point.
I see a lot more veils in church these days and when I contrast that with
the amazing amount of unveiled flesh that makes its appearance on a hot
day in summer, the veil is so much lovelier and more graceful. Unveiling
certainly makes the flesh seems cheap, and the veiling really can remind
one of the sacredness and power of women, the life givers.
When I see someone come into church with
very little clothing and even less sense I am brought back to ancient Corinth
and remember what the Apostle said. “Put your veils back on, girls, the
neighbors are getting the wrong impression."
As ever,
Rev. Know-It-All

The
Question Was
-
- -
Why did women
used to wear veils in church? |
 |