| Dear Rev. Know-It-All,
Why are you so intolerant? I was
infuriated by your last article. You make these blanket statements that
just aren’t universally true. There are a lot of fine people who live
together for a while before marriage and have very successful marriages.
I lived with my husband before marriage and we have been married for almost
thirty years. We have a son who lives in Seattle and is involved in environmental
causes and we have a daughter who is employed at the UN, also in environmental
issues. We are quite proud of them. Your insistence on traditional Catholic
teaching regarding marriage and birth control certainly don’t resonate
in my life. I’m glad my children are doing something to undo the damage
that spiraling population has caused the world’s environment, no thanks
to Catholic “Tradition.”
Connie Cubinage

Dear Connie,
Why do you think that children cause pollution?
Machines cause pollution. There are quite a few countries that have successfully
limited their population, the United States, China, Russia, for instance.
These are also the countries that have caused the most ecological damage.
As machines replace people, carbon emissions replace air. Children are
biological beings who are part of the planet’s life cycle. Human beings
are, in effect, biodegradable, if they live simple lives. We are born and
live and die. Dust we are and to dust we shall return. It is the
fast paced, do-it- now disposable consumerist society that is trashing
the world. I am sure that your little gems return to see you at least
twice a year. How much pollution do they cause as they jet back to the
old home stead? Do they drive SUV’s to the airport and, on the
way, pick up a designer coffee in a large Styrofoam cup? I imagine they
are important people in a hurry. If they lived upstairs they could visit
the old folks without all the pollution. No, babies aren’t ruining the
earth. We consumerists are.
How nice that your rejection of tradition
has worked out so well for you. I wonder how well it’s worked out for
the world you inhabit. Wasn’t one of the first questions, “Am I my
brother’s keeper?” (Excuse me. I should have said “sibling” instead
of “brother.”) Our generation defied moral restrictions without concern
for how it affected the world we live in. We had our rights, after all.
Our concern about the pollution of the physical environment was laudable,
but we have caused a kind of moral pollution which our narcissism makes
us unable to perceive. I, too, am an aging ex-hippie. I remember when we
said groovy and meant it, but I have changed because I am old enough now
to see the harm we have done. We have filled the world with loneliness.
There is a saying, “Home is where you’re safe.” You and I created
an atmosphere in which no commitment was necessarily forever and then we
had our 2.5 children. I feel so sorry for kids in their early twenties.
So many of them seem so rootless. They don’t seem to feel very safe.
They struggle trying to make a living that meets their expectations, the
consumerist expectation with which we raised them. They struggle to establish
some kind of meaningful existence. From us they learned to expect a life
of absolute freedom and now they seem incapable of the limitations committed
relationships require.
I know so many young people who have to
have a place of their own, though they can’t afford it. They have to
go away to school, though they haven’t the resources. They would never
consider living at home while they establish themselves financially. They
need their space, their privacy, their freedom. They get married and then
they find they still need their space, their privacy, their freedom. They
divorce and then they have to move back home because they are buried under
a mountain of debt, because space, privacy and freedom are expensive. Meanwhile
mom and dad would like some space, privacy and freedom in their declining
years. We are not meant to live in space, privacy and freedom, at least
as it is currently defined.
Another early statement about human nature
reads, “It is not good for man to be alone.” We have taught our
children that they have a right to leave any commitment, any relationship
they please. Have you noticed that the first relationship they leave is
usually us? By being lawless and calling it freedom we have created
a climate that does not really value relationship. It may have worked out
for you, just like that SUV and the Styrofoam cup of pricey coffee, but
it isn’t working out so well for those who have to breathe your moral
pollution. You see, we are all in this together. Just as I have to live
with your mess in the physical world, I have to breathe the moral and spiritual
pollution that baby boomer narcissism has created.
I had an Uncle Sylvester. No really, Sylvester.
We were city people for centuries, but Sylvester married a girl who’d
grown up on the farm. When the depression hit, they went back to the farm
and pretty much made sure the rest of family could eat during the worst
of it. Old Uncle Sylvester didn’t refuse to live in crowded conditions
with his in-laws and they didn’t refuse to share their meager resources.
After all, they were family. I ask you, where will you go to flee from
the wrath to come? Home, as the poet says, is where, when you go there,
they have to take you in. The sexual revolution has made a world that is
magnificently housed, but homeless none the less.
Yours, the
Rev.
Know-It-All

The
Question Was
-
- -
Aren't Catholic
views of marriage outmoded? |
 |