| Dear Rev. Know-It-All,
Who wrote the Bible?
Sincerely,
Solomon “Sol” A. Scriptura

Dear Sol,
First, the simple answer.
A lot of people wrote the Bible, because
the Bible is not a book. It’s a library.
The word Bible comes from a Greek word
(of course) “biblia.” Biblia is plural. It means
“books.”
(Biblion = one book, biblia
=2 or more books) There are seventy-three books in the Bible, (unless you
are Protestant, in which case you only have 66 books. Pity.)
There are a lot of sacred books in the world.
Perhaps you are really asking “How did some books come to be regarded
as uniquely inspired by Christians?” It starts with the Jews, or
rather with the Israelites, somewhere in the Sinai Desert. Sometime between
1450 and 1250 years before the birth of Jesus. A fellow named Moses led
the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt through the sea to an encounter
with God at the foot of His holy mountain. Moses went up the mountain and
came back with the law given by God. So it seems that God, through the
agency of Moses wrote the first the sacred books of the Hebrews, as the
Israelites were also called.
Over the next thousand plus years, books
of history, prophecy and religious poetry and parables were added to those
first books of Moses. They were a loose collection of about forty or fifty
books that were respected as inspired, some more than others. About 200
years before the birth of Jesus many, perhaps a majority of Israelites
— now called Judeans, from which we get the word Jew — lived outside
the Holy Land and no longer spoke their ancestral language, Hebrew.
Alexandria, a Greek speaking city on the
Mediterranean coast of Egypt, had a large population of Jews. The king
of Egypt commissioned a Greek translation of the Hebrew holy books. It
was called the “Septuagint”, or the “Books of the Seventy.”
The name comes from the legends surrounding the translation, something
about 70 or seventy-two scholars, or perhaps 70 days necessary for the
work of translation.
We really know very little about the origin
of the Septuagint. Still, the Septuagint became the authoritative
canon of Scripture for Greek-speaking Jews, who quite possibly outnumbered
the Jews who spoke Aramaic, a language close to Hebrew.
(Just a word about “canon.”
Canon originally meant a measuring rod. It is related to the English word
“cane.” Anything that is a canon or canonical is considered normative,
something against which other things can be measured.)
The first disciples of Jesus seem to quote
the Septuagint rather than the Hebrew original when they use the
Hebrew Scripture and even the Qumran documents seem often to rely on the
Septuagint rather than the Hebrew originals. So the Septuagint
was very popular at the time of Christ. When the disciples went out into
the Greek-speaking world, both Jewish and Gentile, they used the Septuagint
as normative. The majority of Jews at the time of Jesus were probably Greek
speakers, just as now the largest single group of Jews are English speakers.
There were more than a million Greek-speaking
Jews living in Egypt, while less than a million lived in the Holy land.
There were perhaps 4 or 5 million Jews alive at them time of Christ, and
practically none used Hebrew as a first language. For many of them, the
Septuagint was the Bible, and when Christianity moved out of the
Greek-speaking Jewish world into the Roman empire, they regarded the Septuagint
as the Scriptures.
The first followers of Jesus didn’t have
a defined New Testament, but the phrase used by St. Justin Martyr around
160 AD is interesting. He speaks of the “memoirs of the apostles.”
It seems that what we regard as the 27 books of the New Testament took
a while to develop, though they seem to have been in place a hundred years
after Jesus. They were the texts that were commonly read at Mass by the
early Christians along with the Septuagint. That’s probably how
they came to be regarded as Scripture.
At this same time, (140 AD) a man named
Marcion
began to teach that the God of the New Testament was not the same as the
savage God of the Old Testament. He also taught that the Old Testament
Scriptures were not valid. He recognized only a shortened Gospel of Luke,
and ten of Paul's epistles. All other writings were rejected. This is interesting
in itself because it implies that as early as 140 AD, certain books were
held to be uniquely inspired.
In response to Marcion, the first Christians
started to list the books that they held sacred.
By the early 200's, Origen of Alexandria
probably used the same 27 books we now regard as the New Testament editions.
The Muratorian
Fragment indicates a New Testament with four gospels. The Muratorian
Fragment is perhaps the oldest known list of the books of the New Testament
from perhaps 170 AD. It claims to be a list of all the works that were
accepted by the churches. There was still debate about the New Testament
canon, but the major writings were accepted by almost all Christians by
200-250 AD.
In his Easter letter of 367, St.
Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, listed the same books that
we regard as the New Testament canon, calling them “canonized" along
with the Septuagint, though he rejected the book of Esther.
The Synod of Hippo, in northern Africa,
in 393, approved the New Testament, as it stands today, together with the
Septuagint books, as did the Councils of Carthage in 397 and 419.
St. Augustine regarded the scriptural canon as closed, as did Pope Damasus
I and the Council of Rome in 382. Damasus' commissioning of the Latin Vulgate
edition of the Bible, c. 383, was instrumental in the fixation of the canon
in the Latin speaking world.
There is however, a fly in the biblical
ointment.
Christians were not the only ones worrying
about the nature of the biblical canon. As early as Rabbi
Akiva, who died in 135 AD, the Jews were worrying about the
exact text of scripture. Rabbi Akiva also believed that Simon
bar Kokhba was the Messiah and seems to have encouraged his
revolt against Rome in 132 AD. In the Bar Kochba revolt, all Jews who professed
Jesus as Messiah were expelled from the territory controlled by the revolutionaries.
Thus began the split between Judaism and
Christianity that endures to this day, though at the time a great percentage,
possibly the majority of Christians were ethnically Jewish or Samaritan.
The Jewish scriptures and the Christian scriptures also seem to begin their
rift at this time. The Christians accepted the larger Septuagint
canon, but the followers of Akiba and the rabbinic Judaism he helped to
found, rejected any book for which the Hebrew original was no longer in
existence. These are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, (also
called Ben Sira or Ecclesiasticus) Baruch, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees
and sections of Daniel and Esther, 7 books plus the non Hebrew sections.
St.
Jerome did not think these books canonical, but he included
them in the Vulgate, (Latin Bible) because the Church regarded them
as canonical and had done so for three centuries. The current Jewish text
called the Masorah, or Masoretic
Text (a Hebrew word meaning "handed down"), was finally completed
and accepted predominantly between the 7th and 11th centuries.
Martin Luther rejected the Catholic Canon
of the Septuagint/Old Testament, in favor of the Masoretic text
and attempted to remove the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation
from the New Testament because they contradicted certain Protestant
doctrines such as Sola
Scriptura and Sola
Fide. His changes to the New Testament weren’t generally
accepted among his fellow reformers. But, these books are still ordered
last in the Luther Bible.
There are more problems with the text of
Scripture.
Manuscripts have variant readings and there
are disputes about translation and so on. What can one do to get the “true
text” of the Bible? If you believe the reformation rule of Sola Scriptura,
(Bible alone), you are up the proverbial creek without a text. But if you
understand that these books are written by many human beings who were inspired
by the Holy Spirit, you don’t really have a problem.
The question you asked at the beginning,
“who wrote the Bible?” is really very easy to answer.
Around a hundred people wrote it. The more
important question is "who chose these books as unique and sacred?" The
Holy Spirit working through the ministry of the Church did that. She recognized
these particular books as being uniquely “God-breathed” (which is what
inspired means) and useful for learning the ways of God. The real author
of the whole library is the Holy Spirit.
Remember what St. Paul tells us in 1 Timothy
3:15 “The church is the pillar and foundation
of truth,” not the Bible. When there is a variant text, or
translation, we have the unbroken tradition of two thousand years to tell
us the exact meaning of those things that are doubtful. We had already
been saying Mass for almost fifty years when the last parts of the New
Testament were set down on paper, and, in a certain sense, it was Mass
that created the Bible. It was at Mass that these books were publicly read
and found to be uniquely filled with the Holy Spirit .
When you think about it, for Catholics,
the Church is the mother of the Bible. For Protestants, the Bible is the
Mother of the Church.
I hope this helps,
Rev.
Know-It-All

The
Question Was
-
- -
Who wrote the
Bible? |
Click
Here To Ask The Reverend Know-It-All A Question
|