 |
|
|
Today's
Question
-
- -
Who do the bishops think they are?
Part 2
-
- -
Sunday
March 11,
2012 |
Who do the bishops think they are?
Part 2
(Letter to Helena Hahn Basquette - continued)
I can hear you saying, “Isn’t it true that the world is overpopulated?”
The
truth is that there is not an overpopulation crisis. Quite the
opposite. The population of Russia has dropped from 148 million in 1990
to 143 million today. It will drop to 111 million by 2050. The Russian
government is now paying people to have children. The population of
China is about to face the same crisis. The Chinese are simply not
having enough children to keep up with their death rate.
People
in China and India have a cultural prejudice in favor of male children.
It is common in both India and China to have an abortion if the child
in its mother’s womb is a girl. That means China and India are on their
way to becoming countries populated by old men. The situation is much
the same in Western Europe. Some estimates predict that at the current
rate, there will be no Italians in 400 years. The situation is much the
same in all of Western Europe. Amazingly, Africa is facing an under
population crisis in parts of central Africa, Zimbabwe and South
Africa. It is the young and those of productive working age, especially
women, who are missing. China will soon face the end of its
abundant work force and its economic growth. So would the United
States, were it not for the immigration of young workers, especially
from Latin America.
How do you define overpopulated? People have
never lived longer nor eaten better than the age in which we now live.
Admittedly there is starvation and a struggle for resources, but
starvation seems usually the result of political inequity and
war, not of inadequate resources.
“But overpopulation causes
pollution!” People don’t cause pollution, any more than cows or
termites or any other form of organic life. Machines cause pollution.
It is fascinating to note that the greatest environmental pollution is
produced by countries that have controlled their population. Russia,
Western Europe, and the United States are all committed to population
control, or have been in the past. They also have large “carbon
footprints.” Now that China has succeeded in limiting its population
growth, it is taking its place among the great polluters.
Depopulated
societies are mechanized societies. They need machines to do the work
that people once did. In the USA we seem to think that it is
reasonable to have one child and three cars, a summer home, a mini
mansion with five televisions, six phones, a garbage can full of
leftovers, styrofoam carry out containers filling the refrigerator etc.
etc. We spend our money on things because we don’t have to
provide for children.
Children are not a form of pollution. They
are, please forgive my reference here, biodegradable. They, like you
and I, are dust and to dust they will return. This is not true of the
styrofoam container that mom got at the carry out as she drove her
Hummer from her job downtown to the prestigious day care academy on the
North Shore to pick up her 2.3 children. The styrofoam container will
still be in a landfill centuries from now.
My mother would never
have gotten carry out to feed her seven children. She couldn’t have
afforded it. Leftovers became soup the next day and hash the day after
that. We ate what we bought. Now our garbage cans are filled with the
food we disdain to reheat and the poor rummage through our dumpsters,
grateful for the feast we have discarded. We pretend that we are
concerned about the environment and pride ourselves on having limited
the size of our family as an effective means of reducing pollution. We
are idiots.
"How about the rights of women? Hasn’t the ability
to control the size of her family empowered woman to compete in the
work place and the wider world? Do you really think that birth control
and abortion have improved the situation of women in the world?"
Again,
forgive my unfortunate turn of phrase. The pill has created
recreational sex, and who has been made the toy of this new game? Women
are objectified more cynically and brutally than ever before. Internet
pornography, the soft porn that passes for prime time comedy, and the
constant search for the more desirable sexual trophy have made women
only as valuable as their makeup. It is not the depth of their souls
nor the quality of their mind that TV producers and advertising agents
value. It is their ability to arouse that really matters.
Women
used to define themselves by their relationships. Now they are working
drones just like men who define themselves by their dreary jobs, not by
their relationships. When asked the question, “What are you?” We answer
that we are lawyers or shop clerks or firemen or firewomen,
bricklayers, soda jerks, whatever. We are not mom and dad, or spouses
and lovers. We are our jobs, not our loves. This is the victory of
feminism?
My mother was an exceptionally beautiful woman. After
giving birth to seven children she struggled to control her weight. My
father was never in favor of my mother’s diets. He worried that they
would ruin her beauty. She was beautiful in his eyes not despite the
fact that she had born seven children, but because of it.
Her
motherhood enhanced her beauty. She never changed her hair color
and wore almost no makeup or jewelry, but my father knew that she was
beautiful and so did her children. She was valued for her relationships
and not for her ornamental value. She was thought of as beautiful by
her husband, her children and all those who knew her well. She had a
dignity that no amount of paint can confer. She was a woman, not
an aging adolescent trying to hide her years with layers of make up,
dyed hair and expensive baubles.
Her virtues were the jewels she
wore. She needed no other ornaments. So many of the jewels that
decorate the beauties of our age of plastic and tinsel are mined by
children forced to work in the mines, digging stones like tanzanite and
diamonds out of the African soil. The gem trade and its child
slavery helps fuel the wars in Africa, Asia and South America.
We
don’t waste our money on having children so we have the wealth to sit
in front of the television and order jewelry that has been dug out of
the rocky ground by children. We pretend that smaller families
are somehow morally superior to large families, when the truth is that
we prefer things to children. We are worse than idiots. We are monsters.
(most certainly to be continued.....)
Rev. Know-It-All
The
Question Was
-
- -
Who do the bishops think they are?
Part 2 |
Click
Here To Ask The Reverend Know-It-All A Question
|
|
|
